ASTM D5084 PDF

GeoTesting Express is a provider of Soil Testing Services – ASTM D, Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity of Saturated Porous. This standard is issued under the fixed designation D ; the number 1 This standard is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D18 on Soil and. Using low hydraulic gradient is time- consuming. ▫ ASTM D suggests a maximum hydraulic gradient of 30 for soils with k ≤ 1 x cm/s.

Author: Dajinn Vucage
Country: Costa Rica
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Photos
Published (Last): 25 January 2013
Pages: 88
PDF File Size: 19.26 Mb
ePub File Size: 10.14 Mb
ISBN: 180-4-27118-620-6
Downloads: 35955
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Vudoran

Link to Active This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard.

However, these test methods are only intended to xstm used when water is the permeant liquid. Strategies that may be possible when dealing with such impervious materials may include the following: In addition, they are representative of the significant digits that should generally be retained. There are six alternate methods or hydraulic systems that may be used to measure the hydraulic conductivity.

The testing time is ultimately controlled by meeting the equilibrium criteria for each Method see 9. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of f5084 limitations prior to use.

If the void ratio is changed, the aztm conductivity of the test specimen will likely change, see Appendix X2. Strategies that may be possible when dealing with such impervious materials may include the following.

These hydraulic systems are as follows:. In addition, they are representative of the significant digits that should generally be retained.

ASTM D5084

Historical Version s – view previous versions of standard. By tradition in U. The quality of the result produced by this standard is dependent of the competence of the personnel performing it and the suitability of the equipment and facilities used. Other approaches, such as use of higher hydraulic gradients, lower viscosity fluid, elimination of any possible chemical gradients and bacterial growth, and strict verification of leakage, may also be considered.

Users of this standard are cautioned that compliance with Practice D does not in itself assure reliable results. Referenced Documents purchase separately The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard. Properly shortening the length or enlarging the cross-sectional area, or both, of the test specimen.

Most Related  6ES7414 4HM14 0AB0 PDF

Tightening the temperature control. The key criterion is that the requirements covered in Section 5 have to be met. The adoption of unsteady state measurements by using high-accuracy equipment along with the rigorous analyses for determining the hydraulic parameters this approach reduces testing duration according to Zhang et al.

Other strategies, such as using higher viscosity d584 or properly decreasing the cross-sectional area of the test specimen, or both, may also be possible. Typically a test can be performed using Methods D, E, or F within two to three days.

Log In ‹ Craig H. Benson, PhD, PE — WordPress

These hydraulic systems are as follows: These hydraulic systems are as follows: It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. These test methods apply to water-saturated porous materials containing virtually no air. Agencies that meet the criteria of Practice D are generally considered capable of competent and objective testing, sampling, inspection, etc. Temperatures outside this range asgm be used, x5084, the user would have to determine the specific gravity of mercury and R T see There are six alternate methods or hydraulic asgm, that may be used to measure the hydraulic conductivity.

Other items, such as use of higher hydraulic gradients, lower viscosity fluid, elimination of any possible chemical gradients and bacterial growth, and strict verification of leakage, may also be considered.

To determine the relationship between hydraulic conductivity and void ratio, the hydraulic conductivity test would have to be repeated at different effective stresses. Reliable results depend on many factors; Practice D provides a means of evaluating some of those factors. It is beyond the scope of this standard to consider significant digits used in analysis methods for engineering design. Hydraulic conductivity varies with varying void ratio, which changes when the effective stress changes.

The procedures used do not consider material variation, purpose for obtaining the data, special purpose studies, or any considerations for the user’s objectives; and it is common practice to increase or reduce significant digits of reported data to be commensurate with these considerations.

Most Related  P6KE200A PDF

ASTM D Standard

Experience has sometimes shown that hydraulic conductivities measured on small test specimens are not necessarily the same as larger-scale values. Active view current version of standard. Permeation with other liquids, such as chemical wastes, can be accomplished using procedures similar to those described in these test methods. Other strategies, such as using higher viscosity fluid or properly decreasing the cross-sectional area of the test specimen, or both, may also be possible.

Methods A, B, and C take a longer period-of-time, from a few days to a few weeks depending on the hydraulic conductivity. Referenced Documents purchase separately The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard.

The procedures used do not consider material variation, purpose for obtaining the data, special purpose studies, or any considerations for the user’s objectives; and it is common practice to increase or reduce significant digits of reported data to be commensurate with these considerations.

The inch-pound units given in parentheses are mathematical conversions, which are provided for information purposes only and are not considered standard, unless specifically stated as standard, such as 0.

Therefore, the results should be applied to field situations with caution and by qualified personnel. The key criterion is that the requirements covered in Section 5 have to be met.

Active Risk Management

Temperatures outside this range may be used; however, the user would have to determine the specific gravity of mercury and R T see Link to Active This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard. It is beyond the scope of this standard astj consider significant digits used in analysis methods for engineering design. These hydraulic systems are as follows:. If the confining stress is less than the swell pressure, anomalous flow conditions my occur; for example, mercury column s move in the wrong direction.